<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google HELP! Stop This Fraud!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/</link>
	<description>My Mind is not Pigeonholed, neither is my Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 16:29:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-13925</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-13925</guid>
		<description>Hey photographer, I completely with you and the abuse of copyrighted photos is immense. I wish for photographers like you, there would be an easier way to charge other companies or people who are using your photos without permission. And if they are not willing to pay, they have to remove them. Otherwise you should be able to sue them easily without big costs of a lawyer. I wonder why is there no union, where you could participate and if this happens you can use one of their lawyer. 

But my point on this post is, these guys putting photos on their website JUST to sue people for a picture of a tomato. They don&#039;t do it for passion, they do photograph for money. And it&#039;s sad, especially because nobody is doing anything against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey photographer, I completely with you and the abuse of copyrighted photos is immense. I wish for photographers like you, there would be an easier way to charge other companies or people who are using your photos without permission. And if they are not willing to pay, they have to remove them. Otherwise you should be able to sue them easily without big costs of a lawyer. I wonder why is there no union, where you could participate and if this happens you can use one of their lawyer. </p>
<p>But my point on this post is, these guys putting photos on their website JUST to sue people for a picture of a tomato. They don&#8217;t do it for passion, they do photograph for money. And it&#8217;s sad, especially because nobody is doing anything against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photographer</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>Think of it this way. I&#039;m a photographer. I make €20K a year taking photos of animals. Each good photo takes a day of my life. I put my photos online to get advertising revenue from my site and so that magazines will see my work and by photos from me. It&#039;s a lot of work and it&#039;s not well paid by most standards but I enjoy it so that&#039;s my life decision. Of course camera equipment, travel and computer equipment are very expensive overheads, which continually need to be replaced…

Now, a second guy comes along and wants to make a site about animals. But he doesn&#039;t take photos - that&#039;s too much work and not well paid enough. He just collects thousands of images from the internet and thousands of snippets of text and makes his site that way. Sometimes he makes a comment like &quot;look at this, this sucks&quot; and sometimes he makes one saying &quot;look at this, cool!&quot;, but other than the website, he invests little time in creating content. That&#039;s because he&#039;s got a real job or full-time occupation, or perhaps he&#039;s a student.

If his site gets big enough hardly anyone will see the original photographer&#039;s site. and the photographer will lose ad revenue and clients because of that. And other people all around the world will copy the image of the fish they see, because now the watermark has been removed and they think if one person can do it why shouldn&#039;t they.

This is the real world. I&#039;m a photographer, I have a website, people love it, they see things they would never have seen otherwise. Millions visit it. I can barely pay my rent but I&#039;m doing what I love. People copy my photos because they want to make some money from advertising. They also print them in magazines in countries where they think I won&#039;t see them. Those publishers drive nice cars and have good pensions. I don&#039;t see the justice in that.

Suing for copyrighted photos is usually the last resort, a huge waste of time for the photographer, and in most cases would be very expensive for the photographer who generally knows very little about legal matters i.e. he would not receive anything or not cover his legal expenses.

I have the problem that a magazine in Germany has published my photos with telling me and it&#039;s a complete nightmare for me trying to work out what to do. If I do nothing it&#039;s like leaving the front door to your house open and letting people walk away with your property. But on €20 K a year the idea of hiring a lawyer terrifies me because of the legal fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it this way. I&#8217;m a photographer. I make €20K a year taking photos of animals. Each good photo takes a day of my life. I put my photos online to get advertising revenue from my site and so that magazines will see my work and by photos from me. It&#8217;s a lot of work and it&#8217;s not well paid by most standards but I enjoy it so that&#8217;s my life decision. Of course camera equipment, travel and computer equipment are very expensive overheads, which continually need to be replaced…</p>
<p>Now, a second guy comes along and wants to make a site about animals. But he doesn&#8217;t take photos &#8211; that&#8217;s too much work and not well paid enough. He just collects thousands of images from the internet and thousands of snippets of text and makes his site that way. Sometimes he makes a comment like &#8220;look at this, this sucks&#8221; and sometimes he makes one saying &#8220;look at this, cool!&#8221;, but other than the website, he invests little time in creating content. That&#8217;s because he&#8217;s got a real job or full-time occupation, or perhaps he&#8217;s a student.</p>
<p>If his site gets big enough hardly anyone will see the original photographer&#8217;s site. and the photographer will lose ad revenue and clients because of that. And other people all around the world will copy the image of the fish they see, because now the watermark has been removed and they think if one person can do it why shouldn&#8217;t they.</p>
<p>This is the real world. I&#8217;m a photographer, I have a website, people love it, they see things they would never have seen otherwise. Millions visit it. I can barely pay my rent but I&#8217;m doing what I love. People copy my photos because they want to make some money from advertising. They also print them in magazines in countries where they think I won&#8217;t see them. Those publishers drive nice cars and have good pensions. I don&#8217;t see the justice in that.</p>
<p>Suing for copyrighted photos is usually the last resort, a huge waste of time for the photographer, and in most cases would be very expensive for the photographer who generally knows very little about legal matters i.e. he would not receive anything or not cover his legal expenses.</p>
<p>I have the problem that a magazine in Germany has published my photos with telling me and it&#8217;s a complete nightmare for me trying to work out what to do. If I do nothing it&#8217;s like leaving the front door to your house open and letting people walk away with your property. But on €20 K a year the idea of hiring a lawyer terrifies me because of the legal fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-12908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-12908</guid>
		<description>Hey Joshua, can you explain a little more what you mean by that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joshua, can you explain a little more what you mean by that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Issac</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-12884</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Issac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-12884</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that where fair-use comes in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that where fair-use comes in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not so easy as you think. Even though you remove it immediately. Use still broke the copyright and they still sue you. It&#039;s like you steal something from a store. They catch you and you bring it back immediately. That doesn&#039;t mean they let you go then :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not so easy as you think. Even though you remove it immediately. Use still broke the copyright and they still sue you. It&#8217;s like you steal something from a store. They catch you and you bring it back immediately. That doesn&#8217;t mean they let you go then <img src='https://notaniche.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerTom</title>
		<link>https://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notaniche.com/google-help-stop-this-fraud/598/#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>I would just say, OK, I&#039;ve removed the image. Now sue me! 
Some people settle these things too early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just say, OK, I&#8217;ve removed the image. Now sue me!<br />
Some people settle these things too early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
